广东国际信托投资公司破产案

广东国际信托投资公司破产案

  申请人:广东国际信托投资公司。住所地:广东省广州市环市东路。
  法定代表人:麦智南,该公司总经理。
  1999年1月11日,广东国际信托投资公司(以下简称广东国投公司)以严重资不抵债、无法偿付到期巨额债务为由,向广东省高级人民法院申请破产。
  广东省高级人民法院经审理查明:
  广东国投公司原名为广东省信托投资公司,1980年7月经广东省人民政府批准在广州市工商行政管理局注册成立,系全民所有制企业法人。1983年经中国人民银行批准为非银行金融机构并享有外汇经营权;1984年3月经广东省工商行政管理局注册登记更改名称为广东国际信托投资公司,注册资金为12亿元。1992年以来,广东国投公司由于经营管理混乱,存在大量高息揽存、帐外经营、乱拆借资金、乱投资等违规经营活动,导致不能支付到期巨额境内外债务,严重资不抵债。1998年10月6日,中国人民银行决定关闭广东国投公司,并组织关闭清算组对其进行关闭清算。关闭清算期间广东国投公司的金融业务和相关的债权债务由中国银行托管,广东国投公司属下的证券交易营业部由广东证券有限责任公司托管,其业务经营活动照常进行。自1998年10月6日至1999年1月6日为期三个月的关闭清算查明,广东国投公司的总资产为214.71亿元,负债361.65亿元,总资产负债率168.23%,资不抵债146.94亿元。1999年1月11日,中国银行发布《关于清偿原省国投自然人债权的公告》,鉴于广东国投公司已严重资不抵债、无力偿还巨额债务,对自然人债权的清偿,只支付本金,不支付利息;中国银行清偿广东国投公司自然人债权后,中国银行广东省分行代广东省财政厅依法申报债权,以普通债权人的身份按破产清偿顺序受偿。
  广东省高级人民法院认为:《中华人民共和国企业破产法(试行)》(以下简称企业破产法)第三条第一项规定:“企业因经营管理不善造成严重亏损,不能清偿到期债务的,依照本法规定宣告破产。”第八条规定:“债务人经其上级主管部门同意后,可以申请宣告破产。”广东国投公司管理极度混乱,严重资不抵债,不能清偿境内外巨额到期债务,符合法律规定的破产条件,于1999年1月16日裁定:
  一、广东国投公司破产还债。
  二、指定清算组接管广东国投公司。
  裁定宣布后,广东国投公司的破产清算工作依法按以下步骤进行:
  一、债权的申报、审核和确认
  1999年1月16日,广东省高级人民法院分别在《人民日报》、《人民法院报》刊登受理广东国投公司破产申请公告,要求债权人自公告之日起3个月内申报债权,逾期未申报的,视为自动放弃。对广东国投公司的其他民事执行程序依法中止执行,申请执行人可凭生效的法律文书申报债权,对广东国投公司的其他民事诉讼程序也依法终结或中止。公告期限内,共计320家债权人申报了债权,申报债权总金额共计387.7738亿元(包括167家境外债权人申报债权320.1297亿元)。
  1999年4月22日,广东省高级人民法院主持召开广东国投公司破产案第一次债权人会议,244家境内外债权人派代表出席了会议,占申报债权人总数的76%。法院向债权人宣布了债权人会议的职权,并根据各债权人申报债权的数额,指定瑞士银行、日本第一劝业银行、美国花旗银行、中国银行等9家债权人组成债权人主席委员会。破产清算组向出席债权人会议的代表报告了债权申报情况。会议通过了由破产清算组提出的广东国投公司破产财产处理的原则。
  破产清算组对债权人申报的债权进行了登记和审核后,将审核结果分别以确认债权或拒绝申报的方式通知各债权申报人。债权人对清算组确认的债权无异议的,清算组提请债权人会议表决通过;债权申报人对清算组的确认结果有异议的,向广东省高级人民法院提请裁定。
  根据债权异议人的申请,广东省高级人民法院分别对广东国投公司破产案中62件有关债权申报异议进行了公开审理,并分别作出了裁定:
  1.对依据安慰函申报的担保债权全部予以否认。在确认债权诉讼中,有15家广东国投公司香港子公司的债权人持广东国投公司出具的安慰函申报金额约23亿元的担保(或然)债权,要求予以确认。广东省高级人民法院经审理认为,安慰函从形式上看,不是广东国投公司与特定债权人签订的,而是向不特定的第三人出具的介绍性函件;从内容上看,安慰函并无担保的意思表示,没有约定当债务人不履行债务时,代为履行或承担还债责任。因此,安慰函不能构成中国法律意义上的保证,不具有保证担保的法律效力,依据安慰函申报担保债权全部被拒绝。
  2.信托存款的存款人可以申报破产债权,但对信托存款无取回权。在确认债权诉讼中,有17家债权人以信托存款为依据向广东国投公司清算组申报债权金额38亿元。部分境内债权人认为信托存款属于信托财产,具有独立性,受托人广东国投公司对信托财产不具有所有权,只具有经营管理权,信托财产的所有权属于委托人,要求行使取回权。广东省高级人民法院审理认为,广东国投公司向存款人出具信托存款单,约定存款人将资金存入广东国投公司,到期取回本息,具有存款合同的特征,存款人与广东国投公司双方设定的是债权债务关系,并非信托关系。广东国投公司被宣告破产后,对于剩余存款应当确认为破产债权,存款人不享有取回权。
  3.债权人依据掉期合同申报的破产债权的确认。债权人依据其与广东国投公司掉期交易申报破产债权被破产清算组拒绝后向法院提出异议。广东省高级人民法院审理认为,利率掉期交易是国际上广泛采用的一种金融方式,目的在于降低筹资成本,防范利率浮动所承受的风险;依据掉期合同申报的破产债权的确认,关键在于认定利率掉期交易是否需要国家外汇管理局的逐笔核准,并对该笔利率掉期交易避险性或投机性作出判断。广东国投公司持有国家外汇管理局颁发的《经营外汇业务许可证》,其外汇业务范围包括自营和代客外汇买卖,故广东国投公司具有从事避险性衍生金融工具交易的主体资格,并不需要国家外汇管理局的逐笔核准;双方所进行的利率掉期交易如果存在相对应的基础工具交易,而不是纯粹根据市场上衍生金融工具价格变动趋势的预测进行的交易,则属于避险性衍生金融工具交易,该笔利率掉期交易则被确认为有效,债权人按照双方约定提供用于计算损失的市场报价证实广东国投公司被关闭导致该笔掉期交易协议提前终止所造成的损失后,债权人申报的破产债权则被确认。
  4.商业银行及其分支机构对广东国投公司拥有的债权总额及所负的债务总额在破产清算前等额抵销。按照企业破产法第33条“债权人对破产企业负有债务的,可以在破产清算前抵销”和《中华人民共和国商业银行法》的第22条“商业银行分支机构不具有法人资格,在总行授权的范围内依法开展业务,其民事责任由总行承担”的规定,商业银行及其分支机构对广东国投公司拥有的债权总额及所负的债务总额可以在破产清算前等额抵销,商业银行分支机构各自申报债权后,由商业银行统一办理行使抵销权。广东国投公司破产清算组依法办理了中国工商银行、中国建设银行等商业银行债权债务抵销事宜。
  广东省高级人民法院最终确认,广东国投公司破产案的债权人共计200家,债权金额总计202.2317亿元。
  二、破产财产的审核、确认和处理
  广东国投公司破产清算组经清算认定,广东国投公司被宣告破产时的帐面总资产为209.3748亿元。当事人对破产清算组有关破产财产的认定提出异议的,依法提请广东省高级人民法院裁定。
  根据当事人的申请,广东省高级人民法院依法裁定确认了下列异议申请:
  1.确认原登记在广东省信托房产开发公司(以下称房产公司)和广信实业有限公司(清盘中)(以下称广信公司)名下的广东国际大厦实业公司的100%股权为广东国投公司破产财产。广东国际大厦实业公司是合作经营(港资)企业,名义上属于房产公司和广信公司所有。破产清算组认为,广东国投公司实际上为其投资公司,其股权应属于广东国投公司所有,要求房产公司和广信公司分别交付各自所持有的50%的股权。广东省高级人民法院经审理认为,虽然工商管理机关登记中广东国际大厦实业公司的中方投资人为房产公司,外方投资人为广信公司,广东国投公司只是其主管部门。但是,房产公司并没有履行出资义务,广信公司的出资实际上也来源于广东国投公司。为了使国际大厦实业公司享受中外合作企业的政策优惠,广东国投公司决定成立广东国际大厦实业公司负责经营管理广东国际大厦,并安排其全资子公司房产公司和在香港注册成立的广信公司作为国际大厦实业公司的中外方股东。由于房产公司和广信公司均没有履行股东最基本的出资义务,均不是合法的股东,广东国投公司作为广东国际大厦实业公司的实际出资者,对该公司应该享有所有权。据此裁定:广东国际大厦实业公司的100%股权归广东国投公司所有。
  2.确认广东国投公司在其全资子公司中的投资权益为破产财产。广东国投公司属下有29家全资子公司,破产清算组区分不同情况,界定了广东国投公司投资权益的追收范围。对于经营状况好,有赢利的全资子公司,采取整体转让的方法,收回投资权益;对于资不抵债,投资权益为负值的全资子公司,根据法律的规定决定结业清算或申请破产。对广东国投公司对外投资形成的股权及收益,主要是通过出售或者转让股权进行,但股权价值为负值的停止追收。
  3.确认广东国投公司所属证券交易营业部收取的股民保证金所有权属于股民所有。广东国投公司所属的4家证券交易营业部是其分支机构,由于这些证券交易营业部长期将股民保证金和自有资金混在一起,违规经营,挪用大量股民保证金,造成股民保证金头寸短缺,截止至1999年1月16日,资金缺口共计为0.7052亿元。破产清算组认为,股民保证金被违规挪用后,股民只能向清算组申报债权,无取回权。广东省高级人民法院经审理认为,保证金是股民委托广东国投公司证券营业部代理买卖股票的结算资金,证券营业部只是代管,股民在证券机构缴存保证金的行为属于委托行为,并不能改变保证金的所有权和使用权的属性。证券营业部没有设立专门保证金帐户分帐管理,过错在于证券交易营业部,并不能因此认为保证金所有权已发生变化。证券交易营业部是广东国投公司的分支机构,广东国投公司破产后,股票所有人依法可以通过破产清算组取回保证金。据此裁定:股民可以取回股票交易保证金余额。
  对经依法确认属于广东国投公司的财产,广东省高级人民法院区别不同情况进行追收或变现:
  对于广东国投公司在广东省内的债权,广东省高级人民法院依照最高人民法院《关于高级人民法院统一管理执行工作若干问题的规定》的规定,裁定指定由广东国投公司的债务人所在地的58个法院分别执行,共计追回15.1亿元。
  对于广东国投公司在其他省、市、自治区的财产,由破产清算组依法追收,共计追回5.3823亿元。
  对于广东国投公司在美国、香港特别行政区等国外和境外的财产,由破产清算组依据当地的法律规定予以回收,共计追回投资及贷款折合2.2984亿元。
  对于广东省内69个政府机关为广东国投公司的债务人出具担保,被确认无效应承担相应的赔偿责任问题,广东省高级人民法院委托广东省审计厅组织审计小组对这些政府机构的预算外资金情况逐个进行了审计,根据审计情况依法对这些政府机关的预算外资金进行了强制执行,对于没有预算外资金的政府机关法院依法办理了执行中止手续,共计追回0.7625亿元。
  对于广东国投公司的破产财产,均采取拍卖或者竞买的方式予以变现。其中:广东国投公司对广东商品展销中心100%的股权以3.89亿元的价格成功拍卖;通过竞买,广东国投公司属下4家证券交易营业部以0.8093亿元的价格转让给广发证券有限责任公司;广东国投公司对江湾新城75%的股权及债权以3.5亿元成功拍卖;广东国投公司对广东国际大厦实业有限公司100%的股权和债权以11.3亿元成功拍卖。
  三、破产财产分配与终结破产程序
  对广东国投公司破产财产追收和变现后,依法优先拨付了破产清算使用(含中介机构专业服务费用、评估费用及其他清算费用),于2000年10月31日、2002年6月28日和2003年2月28日分别召开债权人会议,在优先清偿广东国投公司所欠职工工资、劳动保险费用和所欠税款后,分三次按照比例清偿破产债权。经广东省高级人民法院裁定准予,破产财产分配分三次进行,分配破产财产共计25.34亿元,债权清偿率共计为12.52%。对境外债权人的债权,经征得外汇管理部门同意,一律兑换外币支付。
  广东国投公司破产案有关司法程序进行完毕后,破产清算组依法申请终结破产程序。广东省高级人民政府经审查认为,广东国投公司申请破产一案,债权确认工作已经完成,破产财产的范围已经界定,对外债权的追收工作已经全部采取有效法律措施,广东国投公司的主要破产财产已经拍卖变现,并已经分配给债权人,广东国投公司破产案已符合终结破产程序的法定条件,但因今后仍有可以追收的破产财产、追加分配等善后事宜需要处理,应保留破产清算组继续负责完成追收破产财产和追收分配工作,故应在同意破产清算组终结破产程序申请的同时,继续保留破产清算组处理有关善后事宜。据此,于2003年3月8日依照企业破产法第三十八条和最高人民法院《关于审理企业破产案件若干问题的规定》第九十七条的规定裁定:
  一、终结广东国投公司破产案破产程序。
  二、广东国投公司破产清算组凭本裁定向广东省工商行政管理局办理广东国投公司的注销登记。
  三、保留广东国投公司破产清算组完成追收广东国投公司破产财产、追加分配等善后事宜。
  本案诉讼费减半收取,从破产财产中优先支付。
 

 

ase on the Bankruptcy of Guangdong International Trust & Investment Co., Ltd.
〖Subject〗 ECONOMIC DISPUTE
〖1st Inst date〗 03-08-2003
〖1st Inst Court〗 THE HIGHER PEOPLE'S COURT OF GUANGDONG PROVINCE

Case on the Bankruptcy of Guangdong International Trust & Investment Co., Ltd.
Applicant: Guangdong International Trust & Investment Co., Ltd.. domiciled in Huangshi East Road, Guangzhou Municipality, Guangdong Province
Legal Representative: Mai Zhinan, general manager of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd.
On January 11, 1999, Guangdong International Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd.) applied to the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province for bankruptcy due to its severe insolvency and incapacity to pay off its huge stake of debts.
The Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province held through hearing that:
Guangdong International Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. is originally named as Guandong Trust & Investment Co., Ltd., which was established upon registration in the Administrative Bureau for Industry and Commerce of Guangzhou Municipality and is a legal person enterprise as owned by the whole people, was approved as a non-bank financial institution by the People’s Bank in 1983 and thus enjoyed the right to foreign exchange business. It was renamed as Guandong International Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. upon registration of alteration in the Administrative Bureau for Industry and Commerce with a registered capital of 1.2 billion yuan. Since 1992, the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. conducted a lot of illegal operations such as allurement of deposits by high interest rates, beyond-account operations, unlawful borrowing and lending of funds and arbitrary investment, thereby failing to pay off its huge debts as due both at home and abroad, and was thus seriously insolvent. On October 6, 1998, the People’s Bank of China decided to close down the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd and organized a bankruptcy liquidation group. During the period of liquidation, the relevant financial business as well as the related credits and debts of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. were subject to the trusteeship of the Bank of China, the Securities Business Departments as subordinated to the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. were subject to the trusteeship of Guangdong Securities Co., Ltd. and the business operation thereof was carried on as usual. Through 3-month bankruptcy liquidation from October 6, 1998 to January 6, 1999, the total assets of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. were found to be 21.471 billion yuan and its liabilities 36. 165 billion yuan, with an overall debt-asset ratio of 168. 23 % and 14. 694 billion yuan of insolvency. On January 11, 1999, the Bank of China promulgated an Announcement on Clearing off the Credits of the Natural Persons of the Former International Investment Co., Ltd.. As to the fact that the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. suffered from such severe insolvency that it was incapable of paying off its huge debts, the natural persons were only repaid the principals and without any interest. After the Bank of China cleared off the natural persons’ debts owed by the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd., Guangdong Branch of the Bank of China declared the creditor’s rights on behalf of the Fiscal Department of Guangdong Province and accepted the repayment according to the sequential order of bankruptcy liquidation as a general creditor.
The Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province held that, item (1), Article 3 of the Law of the People’s Court on Enterprise Bankruptcy (for Trial Implementation) (hereinafter referred to as the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law) prescribes that: “Enterprises which, owing to poor operations and management that result in serious losses, are unable to repay their due debts shall be declared bankrupt in accordance with the provisions of this Law.” Article 8 prescribes that “The debtor, upon the agreement of its superior departments in charge, may apply for the declaration of bankruptcy.” The Trust & Investment Co., Ltd had such extreme chaos in management, suffered from serious insolvency and was incapable of repaying all its huge debts as due both at home and abroad, thereby meeting the relevant requirements for bankruptcy. Therefore, the Court adjudicated on January 16, 1999 that:
1. The Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. shall be subject to bankruptcy for repayment of debts.
2. A liquidation group shall be designated to take over the bankruptcy of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd.
After the ruling was announced, the bankruptcy liquidation of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. was carried out according to law by the following steps:
I. Declaration, Examination and Confirmation of the Creditors’ Rights
On January 16, 1999, the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province publicized an announcement on the Acceptance of Application of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. for Bankruptcy on the People’s Daily and the People’s Court Daily, respectively, requesting the creditors to declare their creditors’ rights within 3 months as of the day of announcement. Where anyone fails to make declaration, it shall be deemed as a waiver. The other civil procedures of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. shall be suspended according to law. A petitioner for enforcement may, upon the strength of an effective legal document, declare its creditors’ right. Any other procedure for civil litigation against the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. shall be suspended or closed according to law. Within the term of announcement, a total of 320 creditors declared their creditors’ rights, amounting to a total of 38. 77738 billion yuan of creditors’ rights (including the 32. 01297 billion yuan as declared by 167 overseas creditors).

On April 22, 1999, the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province held the first creditors’ assembly for the bankruptcy of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd., which was attended by the representatives of 244 creditors at home and abroad, 76% of the total creditors that had declared their creditors’ rights. The Court announced the functions and power of the creditors’ assembly and according to the amount of creditors’ rights as respectively declared by each of the relevant creditors, designated 9 creditors including Swiss Bank Corp., Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank, Ltd., Citibank, and the Bank of China to form a President’s Commission of Creditors. The bankruptcy liquidation group reported the declaration of the creditors’ rights to the representatives at the creditors’ meeting. The principles for the disposal of insolvent assets of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. as set forth by the bankruptcy liquidation group was adopted.
The bankruptcy liquidation group made registration of and conducted examination on the creditors’ rights as declared by the creditors and notified the results of examination to all the parties concerned that had declared their creditors’ rights by either confirmation or rejection. Where a creditor had no different opinion on its creditors’ rights as confirmed by the liquidation group, the liquidation group should submit it to the creditors’ assembly for adoption through voting. Where a creditor had any different opinion on the result of confirmation as reached by the liquidation group, it should be filed with the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province for ruling.
In light of the application of the creditors who had different opinions on their creditors’ rights, the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province publicly heard 62 demurrals regarding the declaration of the creditors’ rights as involved in the bankruptcy of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. and made the following rulings as well:
1. The secured creditors’ rights as declared according to the Console Letters shall all be denied. In the action on confirmation of the creditors’ rights, 15 creditors against Hong Kong subsidiaries of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. required the confirmation of their secured (probable) creditors’ rights of 2.3 billion yuan upon the strength of the Console Letter as produced by the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. The Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province held through hearing that, as to the format of the Console Letter, it is only an introductory letter as produced by the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. to a unspecified third party rather than any agreement as concluded between the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. and specified creditors; as to the contents thereof, there isn’t any expression of intent for guaranty or any stipulation that if the debtor fails to make repayment, any other party shall make repayment on its behalf or assume the liabilities for clearing off the debts. Therefore, a Console Letter could not constitute any guaranty regarding the legal sense, had no legal force of securing the guaranty and thus the declaration of creditors’ rights on the basis of the Console Letter shall all be rejected.
2. The depositors of trust deposits may declare their creditors’ rights over bankruptcy yet have no right to withdraw their trust deposits. In an action on the confirmation of the creditor’s rights, 17 creditors declared their creditors' rights based on their trust deposits, up to 3. 8 billion yuan, to the liquidation group of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd.. Some domestic creditors deemed that the trust deposits are trust assets featured by their independency. Thus, the trustee, the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. only has the right to the management of the trust properties rather than the right to ownership, which shall belong to the relevant trustors who have claimed for their right to withdrawal. The Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province held through hearing that, the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. produced trust deposit notes to depositors, stipulating that the depositors deposit their funds into the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. and may, upon expiration, collect the relevant principles and interests, which are the features of a deposit contract. Thus the relationship between the depositors and the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. are the relationship of credits and debts rather than any trust relationship. After the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. is declared bankrupt, the remnant deposits shall be regarded as bankruptcy claims, for which the relevant depositors may enjoy no right to withdrawal.
3. The bankruptcy claims as declared by the relevant creditors according to the swap contracts shall be confirmed. The relevant creditors, whose bankruptcy claims as declared according to their swap transactions with the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. were rejected by the liquidation group, filed a demurral with the court. The Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province held through hearing that the swap transactions of interest rate is a financial means widely adopted all around the world for the purpose of lowering the costs of funding and preventing risks incurred from interest rate fluctuations. The confirmation of the bankruptcy claims as filed according to the swap contracts shall focus on finding out whether the interest rate swap transactions need a deal-by-deal verification by the State Administration of Foreign Exchange and making judgment on the risk-hedging or speculation regarding the interest rate swap transactions. The Trust & Investment Co., Ltd., upon the strength of the License for Foreign Exchange Business as issued by the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, covered a business scope of self-operation as well as sale and purchase of foreign exchange on behalf of its clients. Therefore, the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. is a qualified subject and may engage in the transactions of risk-hedging financial derivatives without being subject to any deal-by-deal approval by the State Administration of Foreign Exchange. Where both parties conduct the interest rate swap transactions through the corresponding fundamental tools rather than merely based on a forecast of the price fluctuation trend of the derivative financial tools, it is a transaction of risk-hedging derivative tools. Therefore, the interest rate swap transactions as conducted between them shall be confirmed as effective. As long as a creditor is able to certify the losses as incurred from the advance termination of an agreement on swap transactions as a result of the bankruptcy of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. according to the price quotation employed in the calculation of losses according to the relevant agreement that both parties have concluded, the bankruptcy claims of the creditors shall be confirmed.
4. The total amount of credits and debts between the Commercial Bank as well as the sub-branches and branches thereof and the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. shall be mutually offset in equal amounts before the bankruptcy liquidation is conducted. According to Article 33 of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law, which prescribes that “Creditors that owe debts to an bankrupt enterprise may offset them before any bankruptcy liquidation is conducted.” and according to Article 22 of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Commercial Banks, which prescribes that “The branches and sub-branches of a commercial bank have no qualification of a legal person, and shall carry out business according to law within the scope of authorization by the parent bank, which shall bear the civil legal liabilities of its branches and sub-branches.” The total amount of credits and debts between the Commercial Bank as well as the sub-branches and branches thereof and the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. may be mutually offset in equal amounts before bankruptcy liquidation is carried out. After the relevant branches and sub-branches respectively declare their creditors' rights, the Commercial Bank shall uniformly exercise its right to offset. The bankruptcy liquidation group of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. has conducted the offsetting of credits and debts for such commercial banks as the Industry and Commerce Bank of China as well as the Construction Bank of China.
The Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province finally confirmed that the creditors of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. amounted to 200 in total, with 20. 22317 billion yuan of the creditors’ rights in total.

II. Examination, Confirmation and Disposal of the Insolvent Assets
The bankruptcy liquidation group of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. confirmed, upon liquidation and confirmation, that the total book value of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. came up to 20. 93748 billion yuan when bankruptcy was announced. Where any party concerned has any different opinion on the confirmation of the relevant insolvent assets, it shall be filed with the Higher People’s Court for ruling according to law.
According to the application of the parties concerned, the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province adjudicated that the following applications for demurrals shall be accepted according to law:
1. The registration of 100% equity of Guangdong International Plaza Industry Co., Ltd. under the Trust Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Real Estate Co., Ltd.) and Guangxin Industry Co., Ltd. (settlement) (hereinafter referred to as Guangxin) are the insolvent assets. Guangdong International Plaza Industry Co., Ltd. is a contractual enterprise (Hong Kong investment) and is nominally owned by the Real Estate Co., Ltd. and Guangxin. The bankruptcy liquidation group believed that the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. is in fact a company invested by Guangdong International Plaza Industry Co., Ltd. and therefore the equity thereof shall belong to the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd.. So, the Real Estate Co., Ltd. and Guangxin are required to deliver 50% of their equity respectively. The Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province held through hearing that, although it is recorded in the registration for industry and commerce that the Chinese party in Guangdong International Plaza Industry Co., Ltd. is the Real Estate Co., Ltd. and the foreign party thereof is Guangxin and that the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. is only the administrative department thereof. However, the Real Estate Co., Ltd. failed to perform its obligations of making capital contributions and the contributions made by Guangxi came from the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd.. In order to enable the International Plaza Industry Co., Ltd. to enjoy the policy preference for a Sino-foreign contractual enterprise, the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. decided to establish Guangdong International Plaza Industry Co., Ltd. to take charge of Guangdong International Plaza and designated its wholly-funded subsidiary, the Real Estate Co., Ltd., as well as Guangxin, which was established upon registration in Hong Kong, to be the Chinese and foreign shareholders of Guangdong International Plaza Industry Co., Ltd. respectively. As neither the Real Estate Co., Ltd. nor Guangdong International Plaza Industry Co., Ltd. fulfilled their basic obligations of capital contributions, neither is a legitimate shareholder. The Trust & Investment Co., Ltd., as the actual capital contributor of Guangdong International Plaza Industry Co., Ltd., shall have the ownership of the company. Therefore, it is ruled that 100% equity of Guangdong International Plaza Industry Co., Ltd. is owned by the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd..
2. It is confirmed that the equities as invested by the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. in its wholly-funded subsidiaries are insolvent assets. There are 29 wholly-funded subsidiaries under the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. and the liquidation group has, based on the different circumstances, defined the scope of recovering the investment equity from the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd.. As to any profit-making wholly-funded subsidiary under sound management, the method of integrated transfer shall be adopted so as to benefit from invested equities. As to any wholly-funded subsidiary with insolvency and negative investment equity, it shall be subject to settlement and liquidation or application for bankruptcy according to the relevant provisions of law. As to any equity or proceeds as generated in the process of making external investment by the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd., it shall be conducted mainly through sale or transfer of equity whereas in case the equity is negative, the relevant recovery shall be stopped.
3. It is confirmed that the ownership of the guaranty money of shareholders of the Securities Business Department as subordinated to the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd belong to the shareholders. The 4 Securities Business Departments as subordinated to the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. are its branches and sub-branches. The said departments have, for a long term, mixed the guaranty money of shareholders with their self-owned capital, conducted rule-breaking operations and misappropriated a large sum of guaranty money of shareholders, thereby incurring a shortage of the position of the guaranty money of shareholders. By January 16, 1999, the capital gap thereof amounted to 7, 052, 000, 000 yuan. The bankruptcy liquidation group believed that, after the guaranty money of shareholders was illegally misappropriated, the shareholders were only able to declare their creditors’ rights to the liquidation group without any right to re-collection. The Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province held through hearing that the guaranty money of shareholders is the fund of settlement in the agent-based purchase and sale of stocks conducted by the Securities Business Departments of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd.. The Securities Business Departments only took care of the guaranty money of shareholders as an agent and the shareholders’ act of paying and depositing the guaranty money is to grant their entrustment, which could not alter the nature of ownership or the right to employment of the guaranty money. The Securities Business Departments failed to establish any separate account of guaranty money of shareholders and thus were at fault. It therefore could not be held that the ownership of the guaranty money has been altered. The Securities Business Departments are branches or sub-branches of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd.. Upon the bankruptcy of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd., the relevant shareholders may, according to law, take back their guaranty money through the bankruptcy liquidation group. It is therefore ruled that the shareholders may collect the balance of their guaranty money in stock trading.
As to the assets of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. that have been confirmed according to law, the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province shall recover or cash them in light of the different circumstances:
According to the creditor’s rights of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. within Guangdong Province, the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province ruled, according to the Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues concerning the Uniform Administration and Implementation by the Higher People’s Court, that the 58 people’s courts where the creditors of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. are located shall implement it respectively, thereby recovering a total of 1. 51 billion yuan.
As to the assets of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. within other provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions, the bankruptcy liquidation group shall conduct recovery according to law, thereby recovering a total of 0. 53823 billion yuan.
As to the overseas assets of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. in the United States and the assets in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, they shall be recalled by the bankruptcy liquidation group according to the local laws, thereby recovering a total of 0. 22984 billion yuan of investment and loan.
As to the guaranty as provided by 69 governmental organs within Guangdong Province for the creditors of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. which was confirmed as invalid and thus the liabilities of compensation shall be assumed, the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province entrusted the Department of Auditing of Guangdong Province to conduct auditing of the extra-budgetary funds of these government organs in an item-by-item manner and, according to the result of auditing, made coercive enforcement of the extra-budgetary funds. As to any government organ without any extra-budgetary fund, the Court handled the formalities for suspension, recovering 7, 625, 000, 000 yuan in total.
The insolvent assets of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. shall all be cashed by the means of auction or bidding. In particular, 100 % equity of Guangdong Commodity Exhibition Center as held by the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. was successively auctioned at a price of 0. 389 billion yuan. Through bidding, the 4 Securities Business Departments as subordinated to the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. were transferred to Guangfa Securities Co., Ltd.; 75% equity of Jiangwan New City as held by the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. was successfully auctioned at a price of 0. 35 billion yuan. 100 % equity as well as the creditors’ rights of Guangdong International Plaza Industry Co., Ltd. as held by the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. was successfully auctioned at a price of 0. 13 billion yuan.

III. Distributions of Insolvent Assets as well as the Procedures for Bankruptcy
Where the insolvent assets of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. are recovered and cashed, the expenses for bankruptcy liquidation shall be appropriated in priority according to law (including the expenses for special services as provided by intermediary agencies, expenses for appraisal as well as other expenses for liquidation). On October 31, 2000, June 28, 2002 and February 28, 2003 a creditors’ meeting was held respectively, at which after clearing off the defaulted payment of wages, expenses for labor insurance as well as defaulted taxes of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd., the bankruptcy claims were, for three times respectively, cleared off according to the relevant proportions. Upon the ruling of the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province, the distribution of insolvent assets was conducted for three times, with a total amount of 2. 534 billion yuan and at a repayment rate of 12. 52%. The creditors’ rights of overseas creditors were, upon the approval of the department of foreign exchange, paid, without exception, in foreign currencies.
After the relevant judicial procedures for bankruptcy of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. was concluded, the bankruptcy liquidation group applied for concluding the procedures for bankruptcy according to law. The Higher People’s Court of Guangdong held through hearing that: as to the case on the application of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. for bankruptcy, the work of confirming the creditors’ rights has been concluded and the scope of insolvent assets has been defined, the relevant legal measures have been adopted for the recourse of external creditors’ rights so that the main insolvent assets of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. have been cashed through auction and have been distributed to the relevant creditors. Therefore the case on bankruptcy of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. meets the statutory requirements for concluding bankruptcy procedures. As, however, there may be such left-over matters as insolvent assets yet to be recovered and additional distribution of recovered assets requiring further settlement, the bankruptcy liquidation group shall be sustained so as to conclude the recovery of insolvent assets as well as the distribution of the recovered assets. Therefore, the bankruptcy liquidation group shall, at the same time when its application for concluding the bankruptcy procedures is approved, be sustained for handling the relevant left-over matters. Accordingly, on March 8, 2003, the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province adjudicated according to Article 38 of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law as well as Article 97 of the Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues regarding the Hearing of the Cases on Enterprise Bankruptcy that:
1. The procedures for bankruptcy of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd shall be concluded;
2. The bankruptcy liquidation group shall, upon the strength of the present Ruling, handle the formalities for registration of write-off of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd in the Administrative Bureau for Industry and Commerce. and
3. The bankruptcy liquidation group shall be sustained to conclude such left-over matters as the recourse of insolvent assets and additional distribution of the Trust & Investment Co., Ltd..
The case acceptance fees shall be collected at a discount of 50% and shall be paid in priority from the insolvent assets.

 







 
Copyright Notice® All Rights Reserved By Jiangyu Wang
1